Cameras are a constant source of disappointment to me because they rarely see what I see.

When I see the three dimensional majesty of the mountain peaks that surround me as I stand in wonder on the plain, the camera sees only the actual sky-line which is surprisingly flat.
Eyes are much better — they inject emotion. They integrate with the other senses to capture the euphoria of a landscape — the freshness of the breeze, the perfume of honeysuckle and hay, the buzzing of the bees and the birdsong. The vibrant greens of a valley re-awaken ancestral stirrings that draw us still to fertility and shelter.

Yesterday I drove to Rhyd in Snowdonia, it was a wonderful spring day — such a shame that the photos could not capture my mood (even if I had remembered the UV filter). These are the best of a bad lot.

I know just what you mean. 📷
I just do not know what You mean.
I mean that your brain edits what you see but the camera does not. Visual perception is much more subjective, we often put into a two dimensional visual image stuff that we know is there, stuff that the camera can’t see.
A photo that really appeals to us is probably more to do with what the image evokes in our brains than with the mechanics of the image
I still greatly appreciate the photos you have shared here. They are still pretty amazing!
That’s really kind of you, Nina — Thanks